Skip to main content
Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations

Credit: USET SPF

A Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations

April 16, 2025

A Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations

Ask students: What would a fully funded and properly implemented Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations mean for Indigenous communities?

Share

Share On Facebook
Share On Twitter
Share On Pinterest
Share On LinkedIn
Email

By Shawn Ralston

A Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations has gained support as tribal leaders and advocates call on the United States to fulfill its longstanding trust and treaty obligations.[2] The phrase invokes the European Recovery Program—commonly known as the Marshall Plan—which the United States implemented after World War II to rebuild war-torn Europe. Today, Indigenous leaders are advocating for a similarly ambitious investment to repair the harm caused by centuries of policies that have left tribal nations underfunded and deprioritized.[3]

The United South and Eastern Tribes Sovereignty Protection Fund (USET SPF) spearheads advocacy for this proposal. This blog post reflects the perspectives and language of the Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations: A Restorative Justice and Domestic Investment Plan published by USET SPF. It provides an overview of the proposed plan and includes discussion questions and further resources to help educators explore this issue with students.

The United States should do whatever it can to assist in the return of normal economic health in the world, without which there can be no political stability and no assured peace.
Secretary of State George C. Marshall [1]

Historical Context: Tribal Nations and the United States

Tribal nations have long been categorized as sovereign political entities, as reaffirmed by the U.S. Constitution,[4] treaties, federal statutes, and Supreme Court decisions.[5] Despite this legal political status, the United States has continuously failed to fulfill its trust and treaty obligations. This negligence has led to widespread disparities in infrastructure, education, health care, and economic opportunity within tribal communities.

The federal government has acted to terminate, assimilate, and destabilize tribal nations through forced removal, violence, broken treaties, and systematic underfunding. Even in the modern era, federal appropriations for tribal nations have fallen short of what is necessary to meet basic needs.[6] This has led to significant gaps in services and infrastructure that are commonplace in other communities.

What Is the Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations?

What we are talking about is not an ask for handouts. This is about the United States living up to the promises that it made to Tribal Nations—promises that were made in exchange for our land and resources.
Kitcki Carroll (Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma), Executive Director of USET and USET SPF

The Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations is a proposal to rectify the historical injustices and ongoing neglect of trust and treaty obligations through a significant investment that acknowledges and begins to address the United States’ debt to Indigenous peoples. Key components of the plan include:

  • A Major Financial Investment: Modeled on the Marshall Plan for Europe, the proposal calls for a large-scale investment in tribal nations to establish a baseline of economic and social stability.
  • Creation of a Department of Tribal Nation Relations: This proposed cabinet-level department would oversee the execution of trust and treaty obligations, ensuring funding is allocated effectively and in consultation with tribal leaders.
  • Mandatory, Direct Funding: The proposal shifts federal funding for tribal programs from discretionary to mandatory and ensures that funds are allocated directly to tribal governments, rather than through competitive grants.
  • Tribal Consultation and Consent: The proposal strengthens tribal nations’ ability to exercise self-governance by requiring federal agencies to obtain direct consent, rather than just consulting with tribal leaders, before implementing policies affecting their communities.
  • Infrastructure and Economic Development: Investments in roads, housing, broadband access, health care facilities, schools, and economic opportunities are tailored to the needs of tribal nations.

Comparing the European and Tribal Nations Marshall Plans

The original Marshall Plan allocated approximately 1-2 percent of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) to rebuild European nations, providing over $13 billion (equivalent to nearly $135 billion today) for a four-year program.[7] By contrast, the United States has historically underfunded tribal nations, with appropriations amounting to just 0.07 percent of the value of land taken from Indigenous peoples. If the United States were to invest at a level comparable to the European Marshall Plan, this would translate to hundreds of billions of dollars dedicated to rebuilding tribal nations.

Why This Matters

Understanding the Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations allows students to engage with key civics concepts, including federal treaty obligations and trust responsibilities, tribal sovereignty, and the long-term impacts of federal Indian policy. This allows students to critically analyze how policy decisions shape tribal self-governance and explore restorative justice in U.S.-tribal nation relations.

Discussion Questions

  1. What were the goals and outcomes of the original Marshall Plan for Europe? How does the Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations compare?
  2. How has the United States historically failed to fulfill its trust and treaty obligations to tribal nations? What have been the consequences?
  3. What would a fully funded and properly implemented Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations mean for Indigenous communities?
  4. What are the potential challenges or criticisms of implementing a Marshall Plan for Tribal Nations?
  5. How does learning about this issue change your perspective on tribal nation rights and U.S. policy?

More Resources: Indigenous Peoples and Native Americans

Share My Lesson is your go-to resource for indigenous peoples and Native American lesson plans with this free PreK-12 collection of resources.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Want to see more stories like this one? Subscribe to the SML e-newsletter!

Close Up
Close Up is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that educates and inspires young people to become informed and engaged citizens. Close Up is the only civic education program that serves every segment of society, actively seeking to provide opportunities for all high school and middle school... See More
Advertisement

Post a comment

Log in or sign up to post a comment.