Activists in Montana.
Share
August 24, 2023
Ask students: How does Montana’s Constitution play a role in this court case, and why was it significant in the judge’s decision? Why is it impactful that they actually won the case?
Share
Monday, a judge in Montana sided with a group of young environmental activists who argued the state was violating its constitution by promoting fossil fuel development without considering the impact on climate change. William Brangham examined the arguments on both sides of the case before the trial and reports on the ruling’s implications in Montana and nationwide.
For a transcript of this story, click here.
News wrap alternative: Check out recent segments from the NewsHour, and choose the story you’re most interested in watching. You can make a Google doc copy of discussion questions that work for any of the stories here.
Five Facts
How does Montana’s Constitution play a role in this court case, and why was it significant in the judge’s decision?
News analysis: What background information could have been useful when reading this lesson?
Alternative: See, Think, Wonder: What did you notice? What did the story make you think? What story would you want to find out more about? Where would you go to learn more?
What students can do: Discuss with a friend, neighbor or classmate — what potential impact might the ruling in this Montana case have beyond the state’s borders?
Republished with permission from PBS NewsHour Classroom.
Explore more resources for educators to find a wide-range of relevant preK-12 lessons on climate change or supporting young people as they continue to lead the conversation around the climate change crisis.
Want to see more stories like this one? Subscribe to the SML e-newsletter!
