Skip to main content
lesson
33 Downloads
Write a review
beta
EdBrAIn It
EdBrAIn uses AI to customize lesson resources for your students’ needs.

Should Third Party Candidates Be Allowed Greater Participation in Presidential Debates?

Share

Share On Facebook
Share On Twitter
Share On Pinterest
Share On LinkedIn
Email
Grade Level Grades 6-12
Resource Type Lesson Plan
License

About This Lesson

Third parties have long struggled to gain a foothold in the United States political system. Since the Election of 1800, America has  developed into a two-party system, in which only one of two major political parties has had a chance of winning the presidency. Third parties face many challenges, including the current electoral system.  However, some political scientists claim that the largest obstacle facing third party presidential candidates today is lack of participation in the presidential debates.

In 1987, the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) was formed. The CPD,  a nonpartisan organization, sets the criteria for who is allowed to participate in the nationally televised presidential debates. One of the more challenging requirements is that candidates must receive 15% in the national polls in order to secure a spot in the debates. This requirement makes it difficult for third parties to have a voice on the national debate stage. Critics have cited this rule as an effort on behalf of Democratic and Republican parties to exclude third party candidates from the debates. Supporters claim that the debates should be reserved for those candidates who have a realistic chance of winning the presidency.

This case exemplifies the greater question of the nature of political participation in American democracy. Should third party candidates be allowed greater participation in presidential debates?

Resources

Files

beta
EdBrAIn uses AI to customize lesson resources for your students’ needs.

ThirdPartyLP.pdf

Lesson Plan
February 13, 2020
127.18 KB

Reviews

Write A Review

Be the first to submit a review!

Advertisement